Abdullah, A. H.,et al (2022). DOES Sketchup Make Improve Students’ Visual-Spatial Skills?. IEEE Access, 10, 13936-13953.

Alonso, J. C., & Uttal D. H. (2019). Science Education and Visuospatial Processing. Visuospatial Processing for Education in Health and Natural Sciences. Springer

Carlisle, D., Tyson, J., & Nieswandt, M. (2015). Fostering spatial skill acquisition by general chemistry students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(3), 478-517.

Dickmann, T; et al (2019). What you see is what you learn? The role of visual model comprehension for academic success in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10.

Gilbert, J. K. & Osborne, R. J. (2007). The Use of Models in Science and Science Teaching. European Journal of Science Education, Vol. 2, No. 1

Harle, M., & Towns, M. (2011). A Review of Spatial Ability Literature, Its Connection to Chemistry, and Implications for Instruction. Chemical Education Research. Vol. 8. No. 3.

Hinze, S. R, et al (2013). When do spatial abilities support student comprehension of STEM visualizations?. Cognitive processing, 14, 129-142.

Kiernan, N. A., Manches, A., & Seery, M. K. (2021). The role of visuospatial thinking in students’ predictions of molecular geometry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(3), 626-639.

Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and instruction, 13(2), 205-226.

Irani, F. (2011). Visual-Spatial Ability. Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. pp. 2652–2654

Johnstone, A. H. (1993). The Development of Chemistry Teaching A Changing Response to Changing Demand. Symposium on Revolution and Evolution in Chemical Education

Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Mathewson, J. H. (1999). Visualâ€spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science education, 83(1), 33-54.

Opfermann, M., Schmeck, A. and Fischer, H.E. (2017). Multiple representations in physics and science education–why should we use them?. Multiple representations in physics education, pp.1-22.

Owens, K. (2013). Visuospatial Reasoning. In Encyclopedia of the Mind. Springer International Publishing: Switzerland

Ryu, M., Nardo, J. E., & Wu, M. Y. M. (2018). An examination of preservice elementary teachers’ representations about chemistry in an intertextuality-and modeling-based course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(3), 681-693.

Stieff, M., & Raje, S. (2008). Expertise and spatial reasoning in advanced scientific problem solving.

Stieff, M., (2011). When Is a Molecule Three Dimensional? A Task-Specific Role for Imagistic Reasoning in Advanced Chemistry. Science Education, Vol.  95(2).

Pappas, C. C., Varelas, M., Barry, A., & Rife, A. (2003). Dialogic inquiry around information texts: The role of intertextuality in constructing scientific understandings in urban primary classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 13, 435–482.

Treagust, D. F., Won, M., & McLure, F. (2017). Multiple representations and students’ conceptual change in science. In Converging perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 121-128). Routledge.

Wu, H. K., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring Visuospatial Thinking in Chemistry Learning. Science Education, Vol. 88 (3).