Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2023). Evaluation of software engineering virtual laboratory in determining undergraduate students’ conceptual understanding: A blended learning model using collaborative-creative virtual learning environment employing critical pedagogy. In Sentiment Analysis and Deep Learning: Proceedings of ICSADL 2022 (pp. 875–899). Springer.

Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–12.

Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’ preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1241–1257.

Creswell, J. W. (1999). Mixed-method research: Introduction and application. In Handbook of educational policy (pp. 455–472). Elsevier.

Doherty, O. J. (2020). Data literacy in the digital age: experience design for a workplace learning solution. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Esparza, D., Wagler, A. E., & Olimpo, J. T. (2020). Characterization of instructor and student behaviors in CURE and non-CURE learning environments: Impacts on student motivation, science identity development, and perceptions of the laboratory experience. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(1), ar10.

Fani, T., & Ghaemi, F. (2011). Implications of Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development (ZPD) in teacher education: ZPTD and self-scaffolding. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1549–1554.

Feisel, L. D., & Rosa, A. J. (2005). The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 121–130.

Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99.

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twentyâ€first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54.

Holmes, N. G., & Bonn, D. A. (2015). Quantitative comparisons to promote inquiry in the introductory physics lab. The Physics Teacher, 53(6), 352–355.

Ibáñez, M.-B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109–123.

Katchevich, D., Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2013). Argumentation in the chemistry laboratory: Inquiry and confirmatory experiments. Research in Science Education, 43, 317–345.

Kolodner, J. L. (2002). Facilitating the learning of design practices: Lessons learned from an inquiry into science education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), 9–40.

Kuhn, D. (2023). Defining and developing data literacy. Routledge Open Research, 2(44), 44.

Leon-Urrutia, M., Taibi, D., Pospelova, V., Splendore, S., Urbsiene, L., & Marjanovic, U. (2020). Data Literacy: An essential skill for the industry. In Industrial Innovation in Digital Age (pp. 326–331). Springer.

Li, Z. (2024). Research on Simulation Experiment Teaching Strategies for High School Physics in Remote Areas. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 12(8), 442–455.

Malik, A., Mugiri, W. L., Zakwandi, R., Safitri, S., & Juliani, T. (2020). Simple Experiment of Doppler Effect Using Smartphone Microfon Sensor. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v10n1.p1-10

Mason, J. (2002). Linking qualitative and quantitative data analysis. In Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 89–110). Routledge.

Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9–18.

Nuryantini, A. Y., Fajriah, H. N., Zakwandi, R., & Nuryadin, B. W. (2020). Simple harmonic motion experiments with the accelerometer sensor on a smartphone: Improving the problem solving-ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1572(1), 12058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1572/1/012058

Nuryantini, A. Y., Sawitri, A., & Nuryadin, B. W. (2018). Constant speed motion analysis using a smartphone magnetometer. Physics Education, 53(6), 65021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/aae26c

Nuryantini, A. Y., Zakwandi, R., & Ariayuda, M. A. (2021). Home-Made Simple Experiment to Measure Sound Intensity using Smartphones. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 10(1), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v10i1.8180

Nuryantini, A. Y., Zakwandi, R., & Ariayuda, M. A. (2022). Smartphone for physics practicum in momentum and impulse. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 7(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v7i1.6687

Nuryantini, A. Y., Zakwandi, R., & Ariayuda, M. A. (2023). Using pendulum oscillation as Doppler effect experiment. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2646(March). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0113172

Nzabahimana, J., Ndihokubwayo, K., & Mugabo, L. R. (2024). Teachers’ Experiences with the Use of Virtual Laboratories in the Teaching of Physics in Rwandan Secondary Schools: A Survey Design. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 1–14.

Odenwald, S. (2020). Smartphone Sensors for Citizen Science Applications: Light and Sound. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1). https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.254

Phillips, P. P., & Stawarski, C. A. (2008). Data collection: Planning for and collecting all types of data. John Wiley & Sons.

Pili, U., Violanda, R., & Ceniza, C. (2018).  Measurement of g using a magnetic pendulum and a smartphone magnetometer . The Physics Teacher, 56(4), 258–259. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5028247

Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction. Educational Design Research, 11–50.

Rahman, F., Khalil, J. K., Jumani, N. B., Ajmal, M., Malik, S., & Sharif, M. (2011). Impact of discussion method on students performance. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(7), 84–94.

Rey, D., & Neuhäuser, M. (2011). Wilcoxon-signed-rank test. In International encyclopedia of statistical science (pp. 1658–1659). Springer.

Sans, J. A., Manjón, F. J., Pereira, A. L. J., Gomez-Tejedor, J. A., & Monsoriu, J. A. (2013). Oscillations studied with the smartphone ambient light sensor. European Journal of Physics, 34(6), 1349–1354. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/34/6/1349

Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R. A., Schulze, S., & John, J. (1995). Students’ understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 131–166.

Schmidt, H. G., De Volder, M. L., De Grave, W. S., Moust, J. H. C., & Patel, V. L. (1989). Explanatory models in the processing of science text: The role of prior knowledge activation through small-group discussion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 610.

Shana, Z., & Abulibdeh, E. S. (2020). Science practical work and its impact on high students’ academic achievement. JOTSE, 10(2), 199–215.

Smalheiser, N. (2017). Data literacy: How to make your experiments robust and reproducible. Academic Press.

Ssebaka, K. E. (2015). Causes of poor performance in physics at 0-level in schools Secondary Schools In Kagadi Town Council In Kibaale District.

Stofflett, R. T., & Stoddart, T. (1994). The ability to understand and use conceptual change pedagogy as a function of prior content learning experience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 31–51.

Szott, A. (2014). Open-ended laboratory investigations in a high school physics course: The difficulties and rewards of implementing inquiry-based learning in a physics lab. The Physics Teacher, 52(1), 17–21.

Van der Loo, M., & De Jonge, E. (2018). Statistical data cleaning with applications in R. John Wiley & Sons.

Wang, T., Wang, W., & Wei, J. (2022). Challenges Encountered by Student Teachers in an Inquiry-Based Laboratory Process. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(12), 3954–3963.

Wise, A. F. (2022). Educating data scientists and data literate citizens for a new generation of data. In Situating Data Science (pp. 165–181). Routledge.

Zakwandi, R., Ariswan, A., Nurfalah, S., Alawiyah, T. A., Amanda, W., Mahen, E. C. S., & Nuryantini, A. Y. (2021). Do It Yourself: Air Drag Force Experiment Using Paper and Scraper Sheet. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika, 6(3), 198–207. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v6i3.1996

Zakwandi, R., Istiyono, E., & Maradona, B. A. (2024). Exploring the effect of problem-solving laboratory on computational thinking skills in physics learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2622(1).

Zee, M., Koomen, H. M. Y., Jellesma, F. C., Geerlings, J., & de Jong, P. F. (2016). Inter-and intra-individual differences in teachers’ self-efficacy: A multilevel factor exploration. Journal of School Psychology, 55, 39–56.