Arastoopour Irgens, G., Dabholkar, S., Bain, C., Woods, P., Hall, K., Swanson, H., Horn, M., & Wilensky, U. (2020). Modeling and measuring high school students’ computational thinking practices in science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29, 137-161. 
Arık, M., & Topçu, M. S. (2022). Computational thinking integration into science classrooms: Example of digestive system. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(1), 99-115. 
Barr, D., Harrison, J., & Conery, L. (2011). Computational thinking: A digital age skill for everyone. Learning & Leading with Technology, 38(6), 20-23. 
Bati, K., Yetişir, M. I., Çalişkan, I., Güneş, G., & Gül Saçan, E. (2018). Teaching the concept of time: A steam-based program on computational thinking in science education. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1507306. 
Boechler, P., Artym, C., Dejong, E., Carbonaro, M., & Stroulia, E. (2014). Computational thinking, code complexity, and prior experience in a videogame-building assignment. 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 
Ching, Y.-H., Hsu, Y.-C., & Baldwin, S. (2018). Developing computational thinking with educational technologies for young learners. TechTrends, 62, 563-573. 
Chongo, S., Osman, K., & Nayan, N. A. (2021). Impact of the Plugged-in and Unplugged Chemistry Computational Thinking Modules on Achievement in Chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(4). 
Chonkaew, P., Sukhummek, B., & Faikhamta, C. (2016). Development of analytical thinking ability and attitudes towards science learning of grade-11 students through science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM education) in the study of stoichiometry. Chemistry education research and practice, 17(4), 842-861. 
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. routledge. 
Cuny, J., Snyder, L., & Wing, J. M. (2010). Demystifying computational thinking for non-computer scientists. Unpublished manuscript in progress, referenced in http://www. cs. cmu. edu/~ CompThink/resources/TheLinkWing. pdf. 
Denning, P. J., & Tedre, M. (2021). Computational thinking for professionals. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 30-33. 
Duit, R. (2014). Teaching and learning the physics energy concept. In Teaching and learning of energy in K–12 education (pp. 67-85). Springer. 
Elfrida Yanty Siregar, Y., Rachmadtullah, R., Pohan, N., Rasmitadila, & Zulela, M. (2019). The impacts of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) on critical thinking in elementary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 
Fadhilah, N., Risanti, D. D., Wahyuono, R. A., Sawitri, D., Mawarani, L. J., Muharja, M., Arimbawa, I. M., & Raafi’u, B. (2023). Energy Experiment Teaching Kit sebagai Alat Bantu Materi Pembelajaran Energi Terbarukan yang Interaktif dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Sains Siswa SDN Ajung 01 Kalisat. Sewagati, 7(4), 634-642. 
Fields, D. A., Kafai, Y. B., & Giang, M. T. (2017). Youth computational participation in the wild: Understanding experience and equity in participating and programming in the online scratch community. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 17(3), 1-22. 
Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (1993). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 10th ed. McGraw-Hill Education. 
Gao, X., & Hew, K. F. (2022). Toward a 5E-based flipped classroom model for teaching computational thinking in elementary school: Effects on student computational thinking and problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(2), 512-543. 
García-Martínez, I., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & León, S. P. (2023). Analysing the impact of artificial intelligence and computational sciences on student performance: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(1), 171-197. 
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational researcher, 42(1), 38-43. 
Guven, G., & Sulun, Y. (2017). Pre-service teachers' knowledge and awareness about renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 663-668. 
Harangus, K., & Katai, Z. (2020). Computational thinking in secondary and higher education. Procedia Manufacturing, 46, 615-622. 
Hiğde, E., & Aktamış, H. (2022). The effects of STEM activities on students’ STEM career interests, motivation, science process skills, science achievement and views. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 101000. 
Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534-2553. 
Hutchins, N. M., Biswas, G., Maróti, M., Lédeczi, Ã., Grover, S., Wolf, R., Blair, K. P., Chin, D., Conlin, L., & Basu, S. (2020). C2STEM: A system for synergistic learning of physics and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29, 83-100. 
Iswanto, B. H., Fadilah, N., & Budi, E. (2021). “Osci-Meterâ€: The practice device for oscillation motion experiment using accelerometer in smartphone to improve high school students’ analytical thinking skills. AIP Conference Proceedings, 
Kafai, Y. B., & Proctor, C. (2022). A revaluation of computational thinking in K–12 education: Moving toward computational literacies. Educational Researcher, 51(2), 146-151. 
Korkmaz, Ö., Çakır, R., & Özden, M. (2015). Computational thinking levels scale (CTLS) adaptation for secondary school level. Gazi journal of education sciences, 1(2), 143-162. 
Kules, B. (2016). Computational thinking is critical thinking: Connecting to university discourse, goals, and learning outcomes. Proceedings of the association for information science and technology, 53(1), 1-6. 
Lavy, V. (2008). Do gender stereotypes reduce girls' or boys' human capital outcomes? Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of public Economics, 92(10-11), 2083-2105. 
Lee, J., Jung, Y., & Park, H. (2017). Gender differences in computational thinking, creativity, and academic interest on elementary SW education. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 21(4), 381-391. 
Lei, H., Chiu, M. M., Li, F., Wang, X., & Geng, Y.-j. (2020). Computational thinking and academic achievement: A meta-analysis among students. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105439. 
Lin, X., Ma, Y., Ma, W., Liu, Y., & Tang, W. (2021). Using peer code review to improve computational thinking in a blended learning environment: A randomized control trial. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(6), 1825-1835. 
Liu, S., Peng, C., & Srivastava, G. (2023). What influences computational thinking? A theoretical and empirical study based on the influence of learning engagement on computational thinking in higher education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(6), 1690-1704. 
Manikutty, G., Sasidharan, S., & Rao, B. (2022). Driving innovation through project based learning: A pre-university STEAM for Social Good initiative. 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 
Miller, L. D., Soh, L.-K., Chiriacescu, V., Ingraham, E., Shell, D. F., Ramsay, S., & Hazley, M. P. (2013). Improving learning of computational thinking using creative thinking exercises in CS-1 computer science courses. 2013 ieee frontiers in education conference (fie), 
Miserandino, M. (1996). Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children. Journal of educational psychology, 88(2), 203. 
Moreno-León, J., Román-González, M., & Robles, G. (2018). On computational thinking as a universal skill: A review of the latest research on this ability. 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 
Ocetkiewicz, I., Tomaszewska, B., & Mróz, A. (2017). Renewable energy in education for sustainable development. The Polish experience. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 92-97. 
Peel, A., Sadler, T. D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2021). Using unplugged computational thinking to scaffold natural selection learning. The American Biology Teacher, 83(2), 112-117. 
Peel, A., Sadler, T. D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2022). Algorithmic explanations: An unplugged instructional approach to integrate science and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(4), 428-441. 
Polat, E., Hopcan, S., Kucuk, S., & Sisman, B. (2021). A comprehensive assessment of secondary school students’ computational thinking skills. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(5), 1965-1980. 
Psycharis, S., Kalovrektis, K., & Xenakis, A. (2020). A Conceptual Framework for Computational Pedagogy in STEAM education: Determinants and perspectives. Hellenic Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 17-32. 
Rahayu, S. (2022). Implementasi PBL terintegrasi STEM dengan flipped classroom untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir sistem siswa SMA pada topik usaha dan energi. 
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary educational psychology, 36(4), 257-267. 
Repenning, A., Webb, D., & Ioannidou, A. (2010). Scalable game design and the development of a checklist for getting computational thinking into public schools. Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 
Rich, K. M., Spaepen, E., Strickland, C., & Moran, C. (2020). Synergies and differences in mathematical and computational thinking: Implications for integrated instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 272-283. 
Rochman, C., & Nasrudin, D. (2018). Basic Physics Concepts of New Renewable Energies. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 
Sengupta, P., Kinnebrew, J. S., Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Clark, D. (2013). Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework. Education and Information Technologies, 18, 351-380. 
Sepeng, P., & Webb, P. (2012). Exploring mathematical discussion in word problem-solving. Pythagoras, 33(1), 1-8. 
Sung, W., & Black, J. B. (2020). Factors to consider when designing effective learning: Infusing computational thinking in mathematics to support thinking-doing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(4), 404-426. 
Susanto, R., & Lestari, E. S. (2021). Development of Tennis Teaching Materials With A Flipbook-Based Anchored Instruction Model for Students of Education Sport, Health and Recreation Study Program in IKIP Budi Utomo Malang. 4th Sriwijaya University Learning and Education International Conference (SULE-IC 2020), 
Tadena, M. T. G., & Salic-Hairulla, M. A. (2021). Local-based lesson on hydrologic cycle with environmental education integration: Designing learners ideas through STEM. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. (2014). Staying engaged: Knowledge and research needs in student engagement. Child development perspectives, 8(3), 137-143. 
Wang, Q. (2019). Developing a Technology-Supported Learning Model for Elementary Education Level. Elementary School Forum (Mimbar Sekolah Dasar), 
Wellborn, J. G. (1992). Engaged and disaffected action: The conceptualization and measurement of motivation in the academic domain. University of Rochester. 
Wilensky, U., & Reisman, K. (2006). Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories—an embodied modeling approach. Cognition and instruction, 24(2), 171-209. 
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. 
Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students' motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 96(2), 236. 
Xu, L., Tong, M.-W., Li, B., Meng, J., & Fan, C.-Y. (2019). Application of concept map in the study of computational thinking training. 2019 14th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 
Xu, X., Shi, Z., Bos, N. A., & Wu, H. (2023). Student engagement and learning outcomes: an empirical study applying a four-dimensional framework. Medical education online, 28(1), 2268347. 
Yin, Y., Khaleghi, S., Hadad, R., & Zhai, X. (2022). Developing effective and accessible activities to improve and assess computational thinking and engineering learning. Educational technology research and development, 70(3), 951-988. 
Yulianti, D., Sugianto, S., & Ngafidin, K. (2022). Scratch assisted physics learning with a STEM approach in the pandemic era to develop 21st century learning skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 185-194. 
Yunita, A., & Aufa, M. (2020). Wetland environment as learning resource using CTL approach to improve critical thinking in 21st century. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 
Zheng, L., Long, M., Niu, J., & Zhong, L. (2023). An automated group learning engagement analysis and feedback approach to promoting collaborative knowledge building, group performance, and socially shared regulation in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(1), 101-133.