Abdurrahman, A., Maulina, H., Nurulsari, N., Sukamto, I., Umam, A. N., & Mulyana, K. M. (2023). Impacts of integrating engineering design process into STEM makerspace on renewable energy unit to foster students’ system thinking skills. Heliyon, 9(4).
Acar, O. A., & Tuncdogan, A. (2019). Using the inquiry-based learning approach to enhance student innovativeness: a conceptual model. Teaching in Higher Education.
AlAli, R., & Wardat, Y. (2024). Enhancing student motivation and achievement in science classrooms through STEM education. STEM Education, 4(3), 183-198.
André, S., & Elgh, F. (2018). Modeling of transdisciplinary engineering assets using the design platform approach for improved customization ability. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 38, 277-290.
Arlinwibowo, J., Kistoro, H., Retnawati, H., Kassymova, G., & Kenzhaliyev, B. (2020). Differences between Indonesia and Singapore based on PISA 2015: Five-factor students’ perception in science education. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 79-87.
Ayar, M. C. (2015). First-hand Experience with Engineering Design and Career Interest in Engineering: An Informal STEM Education Case Study. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(6), 1655–1675.
Azar, A. S., & Keat, O. B. (2024). The Effects of EFL Classroom Environment, Collaborative Learning, Students’ Motivation in Learning, EFL Teachers’ Support on Student's performance: An Empirical Literature Review. International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1), 270–289.
Bamberger, Y. M., & Cahill, C. S. (2013). Teaching design in middle-school: Instructors’ concerns and scaffolding strategies. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 171-185.
Beier, M. E., Kim, M. H., Saterbak, A., Leautaud, V., Bishnoi, S., & Gilberto, J. M. (2019). The effect of authentic projectâ€based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(1), 3-23. 
Belbase, S., Mainali, B. R., Kasemsukpipat, W., Tairab, H., Gochoo, M., & Jarrah, A. (2022). At the dawn of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education: prospects, priorities, processes, and problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(11), 2919-2955.
Bevan, B., Gutwill, J. P., Petrich, M., & Wilkinson, K. (2017). Learning through STEM-rich tinkering: Findings from a jointly negotiated research project taken up in practice. Science Education, 101(4), 546–582. 
Borbor Echeverria, J. A., & Mero Alay, B. S. (2024). Effects of collaborative learning on students’ motivation and engagement (Bachelor's thesis, La Libertad: Universidad Estatal Península de Santa Elena, 2024).
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çokluk, Ö., & Köklü, N. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için istatistik. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Capobianco, B. M., Radloff, J., & Lehman, J. D. (2020). Elementary Science Teachers’ Sense-Making with Learning to Implement Engineering Design and Its Impact on Students’ Science Achievement. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(1), 39–61. 
Chuang, Y. T. (2014). Increasing learning motivation and student engagement through the technology-supported learning environment. Creative Education, 5(23), 1969.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Cui Y, Hong J, Tsai C and Ye J(2022) How does Hands-On Making Attitude Predict Epistemic Curiosity and STEM Career Interests? Evidence from an International Exhibition of Young Inventors. Front. Psychol. 13:859179. 
Elaby, M. F., Elwishy, H. M., Moatamed, S. F., Abdelwahed, M. A., & Rashiedy, A. E. (2022). Does design-build concept improve problem-solving skills? An analysis of first-year engineering students. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(6), 101780.
Fırat, M., Kılınç, H., & Yüzer, T. V. (2018). Level of intrinsic motivation of distance education students in eâ€learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(1), 63-70.
Ghosh, S., & Mitra, J. (2020). Importance of normality testing, parametric and non-parametric approach, association, correlation and linear regression (multiple & multivariate) of data in food & bio-process engineering. In Mathematical and Statistical Applications in Food Engineering (pp. 112-126). CRC Press.
Goshu, B. S., & Ridwan, M. (2024). Exploring the Role of Project-Based Learning in Fostering Critical Thinking Skills. Britain International of Linguistics Arts and Education (BIoLAE) Journal, 6(3), 149-166.
Guzey, S. S., Harwell, M., Moreno, M., Peralta, Y., & Moore, T. J. (2017). The impact of design-based STEM integration curricula on student achievement in engineering, science, and mathematics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 207-222. 
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable operations and computers, 3, 275-285.
Harpe, S. E. (2015). How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data. Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning, 7(6), 836-850.
Hidi, S. E., & Renninger, K. A. (2019). Interest development and its relation to curiosity: Needed neuroscientific research. Educational Psychology Review, 31(4), 833-852.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
Ho, M. T., La, V. P., Nguyen, M. H., Pham, T. H., Vuong, T. T., Vuong, H. M., ... & Vuong, Q. H. (2020). An analytical view on STEM education and outcomes: Examples of the social gap and gender disparity in Vietnam. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105650.
Hollis, K. (2024). Unleashing the power of STEM to engage students across disciplines. Australian Educational Leader, 46(3), 43-46.
Hunaepi, H., Suma, I. K., & Subagia, I. W. (2024). Curiosity in Science Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 3(1), 77–105. 
Ismail, I., Ali, H., & Us, K. A. (2022). Factors affecting critical and holistic thinking in Islamic education in Indonesia: self-concept, system, tradition, culture. (Literature Review of Islamic Education Management). Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 3(3), 407-437.
Jirout, J., & Klahr, D. (2012). Children’s scientific curiosity: In search of an operational definition of an elusive concept. Developmental review, 32(2), 125-160.
Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., Salonen, V., Salmela-Aro, K., Schneider, B., & Krajcik, J. (2021). A teacher–researcher partnership for professional learning: Co-designing project-based learning units to increase student engagement in science classes. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(6), 625-641.
Kashdan, T. B., Gallagher, M. W., Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Breen, W. E., Terhar, D., & Steger, M. F. (2009). The curiosity and exploration inventory-II: Development, factor structure, and psychometrics. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 987–998.
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11.
Khamhaengpol, A., Sriprom, M., & Chuamchaitrakool, P. (2021). Development of STEAM activity on nanotechnology to determine basic science process skills and engineering design process for high school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100796.
Kuo, J. Y., Song, X. T., Chen, C. H., & Patel, C. D. (2021). Fostering design thinking in transdisciplinary engineering education. In Transdisciplinary Engineering for Resilience: Responding to System Disruptions (pp. 63-70). IOS Press.
Laerd Statistics. (n.d.). Spearman’s rank-order correlation: Statistical guide. Laerd Statistics. Retrieved from https://statistics.laerd.com/statistical-guides/spearmans-rank-order-correlation-statistical-guide-2.php Accessed January 27, 2025.
Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., Meldrum, J., & Vallett, D. (2012). Measuring science interest: Rasch validation of the science interest survey. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 643-668.
Le, H. C., Nguyen, V. H., & Nguyen, T. L. (2023). Integrated STEM approaches and associated outcomes of K-12 student learning: a systematic review. Education Sciences, 13(3), 297.
Long, N. T., Yen, N. T. H., & Van Hanh, N. (2020). The Role of Experiential Learning and Engineering Design Process in K-12 STEM Education. International Journal of Education and Practice, 8(4), 720-732.
Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among US students. Science Education, 95(5), 877-907.
McGehee, R. (2024). Bridging Theory and Practice: Implementing Place-Based Scientific Inquiry through Participatory Design (Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University).
Miot, H. A. (2020). Analysis of ordinal data in clinical and experimental studies. Jornal Vascular Brasileiro, 19, e20200185.
Nesmith, S. M., & Cooper, S. (2019). Engineering process as a focus: STEM professional development with elementary STEMâ€focused professional development schools. School Science and Mathematics, 119(8), 487-498.
Oleksiyenko, A. (2018). Global mobility and higher learning. Routledge.
Ozkizilcik, M., & Cebesoy, U. B. (2024). The influence of an engineering design-based STEM course on pre-service science teachers’ understanding of STEM disciplines and engineering design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(2), 727-758.
Özkul, H., & Özden, M. (2020). Investigation of the Effects of Engineering-Oriented STEM Integration Activities on Scientific Process Skills and STEM Career Interests: A Mixed Methods Study. Education & Science/Egitim ve Bilim, 45(204).
Pimthong, P., & Williams, J. (2018). Preservice teachers’ understanding of STEM education. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(2), 289-295. 
Pusca, D., & Northwood, D. O. (2018). Curiosity, creativity and engineering education. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 152-158.
Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. Routledge.
Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768. 
Shahali, E. H. M., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Zulkifeli, M. A. (2016). STEM learning through engineering design: Impact on middle secondary students’ interest towards STEM. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1189-1211.
Spektor-Levy, O., Baruch, Y. K., & Mevarech, Z. (2013). Science and Scientific Curiosity in Pre-school—The teacher's point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 35(13), 2226-2253.
Tang, X., Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S. E., Murayama, K., Lavonen, J., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2022). The differences and similarities between curiosity and interest: Meta-analysis and network analyses. Learning and Instruction, 80, 101628.
Tu, H. Y., & Lee, S. W. Y. (2025). Curiosity, interest, and engagement: unpacking their roles in students’ learning within a virtual game environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(8), 1995-2019.
Uzel, L., & Canbazoğlu Bilici, S. (2022). Engineering design-based activities: Investigation of middle school students’ problem solving and design skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(1), 163-179. 
Vale, I., Barbosa, A., Peixoto, A., & Fernandes, F. (2022). Solving Problems through Engineering Design: an exploratory study with pre-service teachers. Education Sciences, 12(12), 889.
Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2013). School, teacher, peers, and parents' goals emphases and adolescents' motivation to learn science in and out of school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(8), 952-988.
Weible, J. L., & Zimmerman, H. T. (2016). Science curiosity in learning environments: developing an attitudinal scale for research in schools, homes, museums, and the community. International Journal of Science Education, 38(8), 1235-1255.
Winarno, N., Rusdiana, D., Riandi, R., Susilowati, E., & Afifah, R. M. A. (2020). Implementation of Integrated Science Curriculum: A Critical Review of the Literature. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 795-815. 
Witherby, A. E., & Carpenter, S. K. (2022). The rich-get-richer effect: Prior knowledge predicts new learning of domain-relevant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48(4), 483–498. 
Wong, V., Dillon, J., & King, H. (2016). STEM in England: meanings and motivations in the policy arena. International Journal of Science Education, 38(15), 2346-2366.
Wongta, J., Grosseau, C., Yachulawetkunakorn, C., Watthana, C., & Wongwatkit, C. (2021). Effects of a collaborative STEM-based orientation approach on senior high-school students' creativity and operacy. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 15(1), 71-106.
Wu, P. H., Kuo, C. Y., Wu, H. K., Jen, T. H., & Hsu, Y. S. (2018). Learning benefits of secondary school students' inquiryâ€related curiosity: A crossâ€grade comparison of the relationships among learning experiences, curiosity, engagement, and inquiry abilities. Science Education, 102(5), 917-950.
Yannier, N., Hudson, S. E., & Koedinger, K. R. (2020). Active learning is more than hands-on: A mixed-reality AI system to support STEM education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30, 74-96.
Zhan, Z., Shen, W., Xu, Z., Niu, S., & You, G. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the global landscape on STEM education (2004-2021): towards global distribution, subject integration, and research trends. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 171-203.